Approach
The most cost- and time-efficient way to assess applications is to combine source-code review with dynamic testing—maximizing coverage, signal-to-noise, and ROI.
Identify insecure patterns, data flows, and authZ gaps across services and libraries.
Confirm exploitability, chain weaknesses, and demonstrate business impact with evidence.
You receive concise, actionable reporting—no noise—focused on real, exploitable vulnerabilities with clear remediation paths.
The hybrid approach finds issues automation misses and prioritizes what reduces risk fastest.
Need assurance across identity or network layers too? Explore our Penetration Testing Services and Security Controls Audits.
A streamlined, efficient process designed to deliver maximum security value with minimal disruption to your development workflow.
Objectives, scope, rules of engagement, and communication channel (e.g., Slack) agreed up front.
Map data flows and trust boundaries; define abuse cases and prioritized test hypotheses aligned to business risk.
Read-only repo access or secure snapshot, under NDA and least-privilege principles.
Deployed app with seeded accounts and representative data for realistic testing.
Manual code review + dynamic testing; continuous Q&A with your engineers for speed and accuracy.
Executive summary + backlog-ready issues; retest window to validate fixes and update the audit trail.
Deep technical expertise and business awareness—delivered through a collaborative process and reporting your engineers can act on immediately.
Catch systemic flaws early and prevent exploit chains across apps, APIs, and integrations.
Backlog-ready tickets, code snippets, risk context, and prioritization for fast fixes.
Knowledge transfer and secure design patterns that strengthen your SDLC over time.
A complete application security assessment—coverage, clarity, and follow-through.
Manual, context-aware review augmented with tuned SAST to reduce noise and surface real flaws.
Adversarial testing of running apps/APIs to confirm exploitability and chain issues to business impact.
Executive summary, reproducible steps, evidence, impact, and CWE/OWASP categorization.
Developer Q&A via your channel of choice for secure patterns & guidance, and a retest window to verify fixes.
Optional services to extend coverage, reduce noise, and make results stick in your SDLC.
Reduce false positives and increase coverage by tailoring your SAST rules to your stack and frameworks.
Make automated dynamic testing meaningful: encode auth flows, state, and data to exercise real attack paths.
We audit a wide range of targets:
If your target doesn’t fit these categories, contact us and we’ll evaluate feasibility.
Source access increases efficiency and coverage. We can pinpoint flaws quickly instead of relying only on black-box behavior.
Audits are time-boxed; deep code review helps uncover complex vulnerabilities that a pure black-box may miss.
Several secure options are possible based on your constraints:
Yes—collaboration accelerates results and reduces back-and-forth.
We’re happy to work in a private Slack/Teams channel for quick clarifications and early delivery of critical issues.
It speeds up validation and exploit development and reveals deployment/configuration issues early.
Often we can deploy it ourselves from the source code. We’ll discuss options and choose the least-friction approach.
Concise and technical. Executive summary (if required), reproducible steps, evidence, impact, CWE/OWASP mapping, and prioritized remediation.
Some clients prefer backlog-ready tickets instead of a full PDF. We can open issues in your tracker (e.g., GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket) if you grant access.
Uncover vulnerabilities and strengthen your SDLC with expert hybrid testing.